Antonia Stoyanov vs Andrea Obradovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Stoyanov holds an edge in second serve points won, boasting a 41.36% success rate, compared to Obradovic's 35.46%. This could be crucial in determining the match outcome.
• Return Game Statistics: Recently, Stoyanov also outshines Obradovic on return games, winning 53.73% of second serve return points, while Obradovic stands at 51.93%. Their first serve return efficiency is slightly higher as well.
• Responding to Pressure: Stoyanov has demonstrated resilience under pressure with a 48.28% breakpoint save percentage, edging out Obradovic's 45.27%. Could this make the difference when the stakes are high?
• Overall Match Performance: Stoyanov's 61.54% match win rate over the past year narrowly exceeds Obradovic's 58.62%. Does this hint at a higher consistency?
• Surface Preferences: Both players excel on Clay, but Obradovic has a marginally better record with a 61% success rate compared to Stoyanov's 57%.
• Tournament Level Play: Stoyanov has been effective in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 66.67%, slightly ahead of Obradovic's 62.5% at the same level.
• Quality of Competition: Obradovic has faced slightly tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 245.48, compared to Stoyanov's 264.23-ranked opponents.
• Decisive Set Performance: Stoyanov has a better track record in decisive sets, winning 43% versus Obradovic's 33% over the past 12 months.
• Breakpoint Conversion Rate: Obradovic outperforms slightly with a 46.15% breakpoint conversion rate, compared to Stoyanov's 42.22%. Can this make a difference in crucial moments?

Editorial Prediction (September 5, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Stoyanov and Obradovic promises to be an intriguing contest, given their recent performances and head-to-head statistics.

Stoyanov appears to have a slight advantage in multiple areas. His recent superior second serve performance and breakpoint saving skills hint at an edge in serving resilience.

Meanwhile, Obradovic's marginally better performance on clay and efficient breakpoint conversion indicate his potential to capitalize on opportunities effectively.

The quality of competition Obradovic has faced may better prepare him for higher-level matches, but Stoyanov's decisive set record offers an edge in tightly contested situations.

Considering all factors, Stoyanov seems more likely to triumph based on current form. However, Obradovic's ability to convert breakpoints could spring a surprise if he maintains consistency throughout the match.